Through Terminating a Harsh Conservative Social Experiment, This Budget Clearly Outlines How Labour Will Wage the Struggle to Revitalize Britain
Yesterday, the finance minister, Rachel Reeves, presented a Labour Party budget. People have been calling for Labour’s purpose and values to be more clearly expressed. Through the decisions made – a shift to a more equitable tax system, targeting wealth to pay for addressing child poverty, good public services and the cost of living – we have clearly demonstrated what we believe in.
This is why Labour MPs applauded in the Commons, and it’s why we are ready for the battles to come. And it’s why the protests from the right began immediately.
The Central Political Divide in UK Politics
The primary division in British politics is once again on the economy. On the one hand Labour, who aim to change it so it helps ordinary working people, and on the other, our political opponents, who favor the current system and the failed doctrine of the past. We must now take on, and prevail in, the argument.
The Tories were given 14 years to fix things and in reality, by every standard, they got much worse. Their doctrinaire austerity and trickle-down economics – tax breaks for the wealthy, cutting off investment (leaving us with low productivity and wages), and failing to support young people post-Covid – didn’t work.
Record of Decline Under the Previous Administration
Quality of life dropped by the biggest amount since records began, child poverty reached record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest they’ve ever been, wages remained flat, a housing crisis took hold, young people affected by Covid were left on the scrapheap. The history of failure goes on.
One budget alone can’t put all this right, so Labour has a comprehensive plan for rebuilding and for rewiring the country. And we have to go out and continue making the argument for why our approach will reap dividends.
Social Security and Youth Deprivation
Under the Tories, welfare spending rose substantially. As did child poverty, because they didn’t address the underlying issues: low pay, high housing costs, deep inequalities in education, health and regions. The state ends up paying more to deal with the symptoms instead of the cure.
That’s why we are building more affordable homes than for a generation, raising wages and new rights for workers, massively boosting investment in infrastructure and new industries, reducing waiting lists down and bringing down the costs of childcare and energy as we drive for clean power.
Removing the Two-Child Benefit Cap
It’s also why we are absolutely right to use this budget to lift the two-child benefit cap.
For almost a decade, since it was introduced, low-income families with children have suffered from a unjust social experiment that was marketed as fair for working people when it was anything but. Most of the families impacted by it have a parent in work.
It’s done nothing but push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, ultimately, costs us more, as well as being callous and unethical.
Real Impact in Local Areas
From experience from my own constituency – where over 5,000 children will be raised out of poverty as a result of ending the cap – the real impact it’s had. Children wearing £1 wellies as school shoes, children going to bed hungry and cold, living in cramped, damp homes, parents this Christmas relying on food banks for a simple meal or small gift for their kids.
I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already overburdened but have to divert time and resources to supporting children who are living with the consequences of deep poverty.
Lasting Consequences of Youth Hardship
Just one in four pupils from the poorest families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with almost 75% among affluent families. This predisposes them for the disadvantages they face throughout their lives: missed potential, financial struggles and poor health. Children who were raised in poverty are more likely to be unemployed or poor as adults.
Confronting child poverty isn’t just a moral imperative, it is a future-oriented strategy. Poverty costs the economy far, far more than the three billion pound cost of lifting the two-child cap, or expanding free school meals.
That’s why we acted promptly in the budget, despite the very difficult economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees over a hundred additional children pushed into poverty. The effects of lifting it will not occur overnight either, so taking early action in the parliament was vital.
The cap was a totem to 14 years of unsuccessful rightwing ideology. Now it is abolished.
Equitable Financing for Measures
We, as Labour, can also be clear that these measures are being paid for in a just way – from a new gambling levy, closing tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.
Conclusion
Fairness and purpose – that’s how we will win the contest of ideas. This budget is a definitive statement that we gained the election as Labour, and will lead as Labour. As I consistently said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must reclaim the political platform and define the narrative more strongly about what’s truly flawed with the country and how we are repairing it. We’ve definitely done that this week.
So let’s maintain it and prevail in this struggle about how we will renew Britain and address the entrenched inequalities holding us back.